Flat Feet Research - Flatfoot, Fallen Arches, Children, Treatment, Arthrodesis

Flat Feet Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Flat Feet, including details on flatfoot, fallen arches, children, treatment, arthrodesis.


Flat Feet Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Flat Feet

Books on Flat Feet

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Biomechanical comparison of single- and dual-lead pedicle screws in cadaveric spine.

Jacob AT, Ingalhalikar AV, Morgan JH, Channon S, Lim TH, Torner JC, Hitchon PW

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa, USA.

OBJECT: The pedicle screw (PS) is the cornerstone of spinal instrumentation, and its failure often entails additional surgery. Screw pullout is one of the most common reasons for screw failure, particularly in the elderly population. In this study the authors undertook a biomechanical comparison of the maximum pullout force (MPF) required for single- and dual-lead PSs in cadaver vertebrae. METHODS: Radiographs of 40 cadaveric vertebrae (T11-L5) were obtained, and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lateral plane using dual-x-ray absorptiometry with a bone densitometer. One screw of each design was implanted for side-by-side comparison. Vertebrae were potted and mounted on an MTS test frame for accurate measurement of MPF. A total of 80 PSs were tested, 40 each of single- and dual-lead design types. RESULTS: The average MPF for dual-lead screws (533.89 +/- 285.7 N) was comparable to that of single-lead screws (524.90 +/- 311.6 N) (p = 0.3733). The BMD had a significant correlation with MPF for both dual-lead (r = 0.56413, p < 0.0001) and single-lead screws (r = 0.56327, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Barring the effect of BMD, this in vitro biomechanical test showed no significant difference in MPF between single- and dual-lead PSs. Dual-lead PSs can be used to achieve a faster insertion time, without compromising pullout force.

Published 4 January 2008 in J Neurosurg Spine, 8(1): 52-7.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Flat Feet Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Flat Feet Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Flat Feet Books

Cool Cottages: 235 Delightful Retreats, 825 to 3,500 Square Feet

Cool Cottages: 235 Delightful Retreats, 825 to 3,500 Square Feet